Sustainability evaluation of six renewable energy types in China using fucom and mahalanobis distance topsis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/f6kn6j81Keywords:
FUCOM model, Mahalanobis distance TOPSIS, re newable energy, sustainability evaluation, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Energy Policy, Resource Allocation, Renewable Energy Sources (RES), China, Sustainability Indicators, Comparative Analysis, Energy Transition,, Decision Support Systems, Environmental ImpactAbstract
Renewable energy development is crucial for addressing ener
gy security and climate change, yet it faces challenges such as
low energy density, high costs, and policy gaps. To enhance de
cision-making, this study proposes a novel sustainability evalua
tion framework combining the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM)
and Mahalanobis distance-based TOPSIS, tailored to account for
renewable energy characteristics like resource availability and re
newability. Focusing on China, we assess six renewable energy ty
pes (solar, wind, hydraulic, biomass, geothermal, and ocean) using
21 third-level indicators weighted via FUCOM. Results indicate
high sustainability for solar, wind, and hydraulic energy, while bio
mass, geothermal, and ocean energy exhibit weaker sustainability
due to technological and resource constraints. This approach not
only differentiates from traditional fossil fuel assessments but also
provides actionable insights for policymakers to prioritize resource
allocation and optimize renewable energy strategies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 DYNA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
